I just posted this on the Facebook group: What do Jordanians need? (update, group was shut down the next day!)
Great news! I received a donor invitation to a meeting to finance a project to help social media activists in the Middle East get unbreakable tools and bring about more democratic change.
I have earlier posted on my blog that Jordan's political pandora's box is now open (read previous post here.) This means that, as many continue to observe and practice, what was taboo is now Friday breakfast family talk. Meanwhile, the government is stuck - it is stuck in the old way of thinking, of arranging things, of "reforming", and holding "dialog" with an opposition they have kept in regress since independence. They are missing the fact that young aspirations want to change the current forms of opposition just as much as they want to change the current form of governance.
They talk about "dialog" and stick to the old "dialog" proxies. Like Islamic Brotherhood, the Parliament, retired military personnels, and regressive family figures. And when they want to talk to students, they pick the Jordanian student council, which barely any student has ever heard of, let alone elected. The revolution is here, online, and since 2006 we, bloggers and social media researchers, have been saying... "Social media activists are always, always, many steps ahead of any authoritarian regime." Statistically, technically, and scientifically proven, now this has come out to the older generation as an undistortable truth.
What is happening in the Arab world comes from a huge generational gap in education, global access, connectivity and not least, aspirations. The kind of thing that goes beyond national borders, the reach of ministers, technocrats and bureaucrats, and the like. Then there is the digital gap, between the young and even the most advanced national communications bodies. Any blogger can spot authority visiting their blogs, or googling information about them, whereas authorities websites are painstakingly pathetic - an indication of their competence. Any blockage is breakable. And then there are global legions of human right defenders, hackers, etc who do not even know each other IRL or online, but are united in securing a better earth for all.
Addressing "need" and addressing "want" is a distinctive difference. Governments offer to satisfy some "needs" and think that covers all aspirations. They totally miss the fact, that what we want, is beyond what we need. In fact, most of us don't need anything, but we want: nations where every individual, man or woman, is free to choose the course of their lives, and has the means to achieve it.
Addressing "need" and addressing "want" is a distinctive difference. Governments offer to satisfy some "needs" and think that covers all aspirations. They totally miss the fact, that what we want, is beyond what we need. In fact, most of us don't need anything, but we want: nations where every individual, man or woman, is free to choose the course of their lives, and has the means to achieve it.
Question is what do authorities need to do - reorganisation - the tools are out there, offered by the likes of Transparency International, UNDP, etc etc. But those offer the basics. What we aspire to, as Jordanian or Arab youth, is beyond food, shelter, jobs, marriage, a means of transportation and some "dignity." We want to see the kind of social revolution that brings people of all orgins, all beliefs, and both sexes together in one hand, as equals - and to that end - they all have a common goal - to secure that equality. The kind of thing that was sparked really in Egypt - where social media "anarchists" inspired millions of offline people to come out of the "closet."
Down with the old ways of thinking. We do not need parliamentarians who want to give us "pizza and hamburgers" because we use "facebook and twitter" and call us all sorts of derogatory names. We do not want a government that is stuck in models that make the 1950s sound progressive. And we certainly do not need a leadership which cannot fix all this, nor one that decides whether and when we are "ready" for democratic change. We want to do it ourselves, we don't need anyone.
It will take time, but we won't stand aside as fellow Arabs advance while we regress. Let alone the rest of the world - who finally is waking up to the fact that they too, have been decieved by our rulers - Jordanian officials are becoming an inside joke at European Foreign Ministries: "...everything is on track, like in Jordan, but you know how it is...". This is a revolution against authoritarian systems, from patriarchal homes to monarchical heredity... not from the top down, not from the bottom up, but flat!
This has been my rant after learning that the new government in Jordan - which has not even promised any substantial reforms got a vote of confidence from a parliament that dissed protests and protestors (and voted almost unanimously to give confidence to the former corrupt government). Same same, but different, like they say in Bangkok.
Anyway, here's another view with much more influence and credibility.
This has been my rant after learning that the new government in Jordan - which has not even promised any substantial reforms got a vote of confidence from a parliament that dissed protests and protestors (and voted almost unanimously to give confidence to the former corrupt government). Same same, but different, like they say in Bangkok.
Anyway, here's another view with much more influence and credibility.
2 comments:
i don't like to sound old fashion, or seem im not catching up. However, let's hope that the ongoing change is the positive type. By that I mean that whatever happens, it will be a better future for all. From my own angle of view, I am not that optimistic. why? because change should be felt in people themselves first. The mentality of all Jordanians, from all origins, is still riging. There is no sense of community, no respect of the social contract between members of the society, the media, especially electronic websites, suck big time. All are serving their own agenda and interested only in lining their pockets. there are dozens of sit-ins and protests, but few are demanding political reforms. That is why the establishment is adopting a double-edged policy of apeasement and buying time, lots of time. How? the decisions related to legislative and constitutional changes are left to participant in the dialogue. Now the big questions are left hanging and alot of pickering over represention. Tribes are alreday nervous that Jordanians of Palestinian origin will rule if they secured fair representation based on their population. This group, in turn, hstorically vote for Islamists, a choice that gets Israel and the west also nervous, bearing in mind that Jordan has 600km borderline with Israel. There are more questions: equal opportunity for Palestinians: will they be allowed to join off-limit institutions like the army, intelligence and high positions in the administration? I suppose they will not due to sensitivities inherent in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Subsequently, we are left with three scenarios: first, the government will have enough time to absorb the shocks caused by regional revolts and will keep the status quo just cosmotically changed. Second, more friction between the two main population groups over who takes how much of the power pie. Third, east Jordanians will keep the privileges they have had, due to their influence, and west Palestinians will accept the outcome, especially since stability of the Hashemite throne is in their interest. In other words, the major cities, which are demographically dominated by the Palestinian element will not take to the streets the way things happened in Egypt or Tunisia. I guess we will talk about taboos over breakfast table for a long time to come.
dear reporter99....
I encourage your initiative to discuss this so openly. Yet I regret that it is easy for us to get "stuck" discussing the options that were offered to us by the media, and the scenarios that officials warn about. Whereas it could be something completely different, if we dared to step out of the details and focus on the big picture, all the details will then fall in place.
I don't think Jordanians want to hurt Palestinians, or the other way around. That's just what officials ramble about to keep us thinking of the division.
Post a Comment