Thursday, October 08, 2009

heavy metal in Jordan in the 1990s: "we were rebels"

“Wherever we came out we were branded Satanists,” writes Rami Abdel Rahman in this personal account of his experiences as a young metal head in the 1990s heavy metal scene of Jordan.

Read the whole history on FREEMUSE.ORG

Monday, October 05, 2009

Finding strength when living in limbo...

...limbo is not a place, it is the state of mind. The place, though, is Lidingö, the island where I choose to live temporarily under this limbo period. It is just east of Stockholm city central, and is linked to it by two bridges, one for trams, cyclists and pedestrians and one for cars and buses, as seen below.

Live up on that hill, just right at the eastern side of the bridge.

The situation is as this. Me and the "ex wife" have been physically, legally, and emotionally separated for a few months now, and I needed an escape, a change of location, so I moved to an apartment in this fancy, healthy island.

Now, I live with "Donna Magadi Guru" - a friend that inspires me everyday to come up with something fun to do. She's half Polish, half Hungarian, born and raised in Gothenburg on the west coast of Sweden, and has lived in Central America, Poland and other places around the world - a la globe trotter. At home, we speak Arabic, English, Swedish, Polish, Hungarian and bits and pieces of Spanish, Italian, French and German. We listen to music from Brazil to Japan, and play on Instruments from Africa, India, South US, Scandinavia and the Middle East.

Me and Magdi on one of those nightouts with friends.

Our average day consists of breakfast with espresso, experimental dinner with friends over wine, a walk through autumns colors, a bit of yoga, some musical jamming on exotic drums and an acoustic guitar, and deep discussions as this one - recorded exclusively for the readers of this blog :)

video
Sound file: Rami and Donna Magadi Guru go ballisitic on drums on one of those night-ins

Meanwhile, my life is undergoing a recycle. I am no longer with the same woman that I loved. I thought it would end amicably, but I was wrong, it was a break up of the worst kind - and I will restrict to saying that I have only myself to blame. The next picture, probably symbolizes best where I stand, on a wall, between two edges, getting recycled. If I fall on one edge I'd be crushed by speeding motors, and if I fell on the other I'd be crushed by huge machines, so I have to maintain a good balance and a great zen, walking right on the edge - figuratively speaking.


On our doorstep, there is a note on the outside that reads: "No advertisements please... We love Spotify, spicy food and....," and a reminder on the inside that reads: "money - transport card - keys - cigarettes - mobile phone and LOVE." You've got to take the love that we have in and spread it out into the world.

The reminder on the front door's inside

This is probably one of the lessons I've learned recently, through the tough part of breaking up, that one could work all his life for a dream, literally, and lose it all in a split second because of a moment when we let our selfishness and hate take over our kindness and love. It is a lesson that hopefully will not hurt me forever, but it would be a scar that I have to wear inside for the rest of my life. Wisdom sometimes comes the hard way, and that way it comes to stay. Part of the personal development - I keep telling myself, as I live in this state of limbo, where I do not know how my future will look like.

Speaking of doors. Just when I worked all my life to open one door, it closed wide shut right at the last step. So I looked around, and I looked back, and I saw lots of hard work, all documented all the way, and through it I saw a new light, a new hope and another door opened, a little longer, with a few new bumps. It is by no way a short cut, and it is clouded with uncertainty. But I am closer to that door than any other, and most importantly, I am independent and the door keeper waved at me to walk that way - the independent way.

Unfortunately, in the process, and under this state of limbo - I cannot travel to see my family, and I had to miss my beautiful sister's wedding. But I will make it up for her, and good that my family understands my situation.


Rania Abdelrahman, my sister, tied the knot last friday.

However, now I walk alone - with lots of love from friends and family, but I walk alone. I am learning forgiveness, and just when we learn to forgive, we find the light of our lives. This period will prove to be the most beautiful, yet the hardest, and through love and hurt, hardships and ease, music and silence, we live life to the maximum extent, and gain character and wisdom. Who knows, maybe I will become a wizard one day. :)

I find faith in going solo.

Wednesday, September 02, 2009

Celebrating the end of the 00s - good riddance

In four months, we will be celebrating the end of the 00s, a decade that would probably be more remembered for terrorism, social media, natural disasters, viruses, and the globalization of war (as opposed to world war I, II). In 1999, media around the world used the usual scare tactics of predicting a global shut down, the Y2K - We were expecting all electronic date registers to break back to the 1900s instead of moving on to 2000s. Both 00s nonetheless.

There was no nuclear armageddon, and machines did not burst out of order - quite the opposite, during the past ten years we've seen huge technological advancements. Social media, for example, reinvented and revolutionized media and public dissemination of information from the traditional Top-Down communication systems to people communicating on a flat level with other people, regardless of whether they are on top of things, or if they were laying low.

September 11, 2001 was the day that should not have been. The terror attacks on the globe's two largest financial icons - the twin towers of New York - paved way for the largest war in human history - a war fought globally against unseen enemies - and regressed the situation of human rights and human integrity globally. The west and the east, north and south were affected - we are now all under surveillance, everyone is a suspect of a crimes that did not happen yet.

2003 to date, the global war on terrorism takes another front - Iraq - sandwiching Iran between US-led NATO forces in Afghanistan and US-led Coalition watching over the oil interests in Iraq. At a later stage, oil prices hike to unprecedented levels, paving way for two important developments : the worst financial crisis / credit crunch to date and a shift in political rhetoric towards a much commercially-hyped switch to greener energy sources.

Katarina, the Tsunami, China's earthquake, to name but a few natural disasters took place around the mid to late 00s. Terror attacks spread out from Madrid, to London, Amman to Istanbul. Meanwhile, the shaikhs of the Gulf region made more money than they can ever spend, as well as the weapons industry - it sold more weapons during the 00s than in any other decade.

Then there was Google, the new all seeing, all knowing God - totally synchronized with our Facebook profiles. Human communication became more and more abbreviated: RnB, BrB, Y2K, LOL, Nasdaq, .gov, .net, .com, www, etc etc

On a cautiously positive note, the US hegemony placed an African-American as a president - just when the EU member nations and parliament is over-taken by formerly extreme right-wing parties, from Danmark to Holland and more recently Belgium andHungary. Meanwhile the Middle East sketched out its plans to go all nuclear, while Israel bombed Beirut, and almost wiped out Gaza.

A surge in ultra-orthodox islam shaped the Arab world's anti-globalization, anti-"westernization" opposition, ironically enough, being the only beneficiary of any democratic development. Democracy has been dying all over the 00s, all over the world, as anti-democratic parties come out winners of democratic elections.

Now, towards the end of the 00s, the whole western world will be taking the same flu shots, and this may spread to some priviliged nations too. The rest of the world will continue to suffer the lack of clean water or sanitation... and the picture looks grim, if we are to consider the effects of climate change on human development.

2010s (looks pretty symmetric) should be all about enforcing equality between men and women, promoting forgiveness as the basis for conflict resolution, and climate, climate, climate... But I have a good feeling that is not going to happen.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Translation: Controversial article about Israeli army stealing body organs from Palestinians

I got this translation directly from the author of the article, Donald Boström. The article caused a diplomatic stir between Israel and Sweden, as the Israeli government demanded an offical condemnation from the Sweden, which responded that it has nothing to do with the article and that the newspaper that published it is the only body that is responsible for the content. (Reminded me of the Cartoon crisis, when governments in the Muslim world demanded appologies and condemnations from the Danish government, which in return defended the freedom of press in Danmark.

"You could call me a ”matchmaker”, said Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, from Brooklyn, USA, in a secret recording with an FBI-agent whom he believed to be a client. Ten days later, at the end of July this year, Rosenbaum was arrested and a vast, Sopranos-like, imbroglio of money-laundering and illegal organ-trade was revealed. Rosenbaum’s matchmaking had nothing to do with romance. It was all about buying and selling kidneys from Israel on the black market. Rosenbaum says that he buys the kidneys for 10 000 dollars, from poor people. He then proceeds to sell the organs to desperate patients in the States for 160 000 dollars. The accusations have shaken the American transplantation business. If they are true it means that organ trafficking is documented for the first time in the US, experts tell the New Jersey Real-Time News.

On the question of how many organs he has sold Rosenbaum replies: ”Quite a lot. And I have never failed,” he boasts. The business has been running for quite some time. Francis Delmonici, professor of transplant surgery at Harvard and member of the National Kidney Foundation’s Board of Directors, tells the same newspaper that organ-trafficking, similar to the one reported from Israel, is carried out in other places of the world as well. 5 – 6 000 operations a year, about ten per cent of the world’s kidney transplants are carried out illegally, according to Delmonici.

Countries suspected of these activities are Pakistan, the Philippines and China, where the organs are allegedly taken from executed prisoners. But Palestinians also harbor strong suspicions against Israel for seizing young men and having them serve as the country’s organ reserve – a very serious accusation, with enough question marks to motivate the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to start an investigation about possible war crimes.

Israel has repeatedly been under fire for its unethical ways of dealing with organs and transplants. France was among the countries that ceased organ collaboration with Israel in the nineties. Jerusalem Post wrote that ”the rest of the European countries are expected to follow France’s example shortly.”

Half of the kidneys transplanted to Israelis since the beginning of the 2000s have been bought illegally from Turkey, Eastern Europe or Latin America. Israeli health authorities have full knowledge of this business but do nothing to stop it. At a conference in 2003 it was shown that Israel is the only western country with a medical profession that doesn’t condemn the illegal organ trade. The country takes no legal measures against doctors participating in the illegal business – on the contrary, chief medical officers of Israel’s big hospitals are involved in most of the illegal transplants, according to Dagens Nyheter (December 5, -03).

In the summer of 1992, Ehud Olmert, then minister of health, tried to address the issue of organ shortage by launching a big campaign aimed at having the Israeli public register for postmortal organ donation. Half a million pamphlets were spread in local newspapers. Ehud Olmert himself was the first person to sign up. A couple of weeks later the Jerusalem Post reported that the campaign was a success. No fewer than 35 000 people had signed up. Prior to the campaign it would have been 500 in a normal month. In the same article, however, Judy Siegel, the reporter, wrote that the gap between supply and demand was still large. 500 people were in line for kidney transplant, but only 124 transplants could be performed. Of 45 people in need of a new liver only three could be operated on in Israel.

While the campaign was running, young Palestinian men started to disappear from villages in the West Bank and Gaza. After five days Israeli soldiers would bring them back dead, with their bodies ripped open.

Talk of the bodies terrified the population of the occupied territories. There were rumors of a dramatic increase of young men disappearing, with ensuing nightly funerals of autopsied bodies.

I was in the area at the time, working on a book. On several occasions I was approached by UN staff concerned about the developments. The persons contacting me said that organ theft definitely occurred but that they were prevented from doing anything about it. On an assignment from a broadcasting network I then travelled around interviewing a great number of Palestininan families in the West Bank and Gaza – meeting parents who told of how their sons had been deprived of organs before being killed. One example that I encountered on this eerie trip was the young stone-thrower Bilal Achmed Ghanan.

It was close to midnight when the motor roar from an Israeli military column sounded from the outskirts of Imatin, a small village in the northern parts of the West Bank. The two thousand inhabitants were awake. They were still, waiting, like silent shadows in the dark, some lying upon roofs, others hiding behind curtains, walls, or trees that provided protection during the curfew but still offered a full view toward what would become the grave for the first martyr of the village. The military had interrupted the electricity and the area was now a closed-off military zone – not even a cat could move outdoors without risking its life. The overpowering silence of the dark night was only interrupted by quiet sobbing. I don’t remember if our shivering was due to the cold or to the tension. Five days earlier, on May 13, 1992, an Israeli special force had used the village’s carpentry workshop for an ambush. The person they were assigned to put out of action was Bilal Achmed Ghanan, one of the stone-throwing Palestinian youngsters who made life difficult for the Israeli soldiers.

As one of the leading stone-throwers Bilal Ghanan had been wanted by the military for a couple of years. Together with other stone-throwing boys he hid in the Nablus mountains, with no roof over his head. Getting caught meant torture and death for these boys – they had to stay in the mountains at all costs.

On May 13 Bilal made an exception, when for some reason, he walked unprotected by the carpentry workshop. Not even Talal, his older brother, knows why he took this risk. Maybe the boys were out of food and needed to restock.

Everything went according to plan for the Israeli special force. The soldiers stubbed their cigarettes, put away their cans of Coca-Cola, and calmly aimed through the broken window. When Bilal was close enough they needed only to pull the triggers. The first shot hit him in the chest. According to villagers who witnessed the incident he was subsequently shot with one bullet in each leg. Two soldiers then ran down from the carpentry workshop and shot Bilal once in the stomach. Finally, they grabbed him by his feet and dragged him up the twenty stone steps of the workshop stair. Villagers say that people from both the UN and the Red Crescent were close by, heard the discharge and came to look for wounded people in need of care. Some arguing took place as to who should take care of the victim. Discussions ended with Israeli soldiers loading the badly wounded Bilal in a jeep and driving him to the outskirts of the village, where a military helicopter waited. The boy was flown to a destination unknown to his family. Five days later he came back, dead and wrapped in green hospital fabric.

A villager recognized Captain Yahya, the leader of the military column who had transported Bilal from the postmortem center Abu Kabir, outside of Tel Aviv, to the place for his final rest. ”Captain Yahya is the worst of them all,” the villager whispered in my ear. After Yahya had unloaded the body and changed the green fabric for a light cotton one, some male relatives of the victim were chosen by the soldiers to do the job of digging and mixing cement.

Together with the sharp noises from the shovels we could hear laughter from the soldiers who, as they waited to go home, exchanged some jokes. As Bilal was put in the grave his chest was uncovered. Suddenly it became clear to the few people present just what kind of abuse the boy had been exposed to. Bilal was not by far the first young Palestinian to be buried with a slit from his abdomen up to his chin.

The families in the West Bank and in Gaza felt that they knew exactly what had happened: ”Our sons are used as involuntary organ donors,” relatives of Khaled from Nablus told me, as did the mother of Raed from Jenin and the uncles of Machmod and Nafes from Gaza, who had all disappeared for a number of days only to return at night, dead and autopsied. Why are they keeping the bodies for up to five days before they let us bury them? What happened to the bodies during that time? Why are they performing autopsy, against our will, when the cause of death is obvious? Why are the bodies returned at night? Why is it done with a military escort? Why is the area closed off during the funeral? Why is the electricity interrupted? Nafe’s uncle was upset and he had a lot of questions.

The relatives of the dead Palestinians no longer harbored any doubts as to the reasons for the killings, but the spokesperson for the Israeli army claimed that the allegations of organ theft were lies. All the Palestinian victims go through autopsy on a routine basis, he said. Bilal Achmed Ghanem was one of 133 Palestinians killed in various ways that year. According to the Palestinian statistics the causes of death were: shot in the street, explosion, tear gas, deliberately run over, hanged in prison, shot in school, killed at home etcetera. The 133 people killed were between four months to 88 years old. Only half of them, 69 victims, went through postmortem examination. The routine autopsy of killed Palestinians – of which the army spokesperson was talking – has no bearing on the reality in the occupied territories. The questions remain.

We know that Israel has a great need for organs, that there is a vast and illegal trade of organs which has been running for many years now, that the authorities are aware of it and that doctors in managing positions at the big hospitals participate, as well as civil servants at various levels. We also know that young Palestinian men disappeared, that they were brought back after five days, at night, under tremendous secrecy, stitched back together after having been cut from abdomen to chin.

It’s time to bring clarity to this macabre business, to shed light on what is going on and what has taken place in the territories occupied by Israel since the Intifada began."


Monday, August 24, 2009

Launching my website

It has been up for a while, undergoing fine tuning, but I thought I'd tip my blog readers about it. On this website you can find news articles that I have been writing, link to blog post, twitter feed, my CV and some more information. It will be updated regularly with new articles and media productions.

Your feedback is appreciated.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Social media in the water sector?

Watch me complain at the World Water Week.

Monday, May 25, 2009

Reflecting: YLVP 2009 - Stage one: Sweden

Three weeks.
33 young Arab and Swedish opinion leaders.
Different locations around Stockholm.
Reality TV style.
Goal: Change the world.
Tool: Social Media.


The whole group (except for mark, who suspiciously disappeared).
Photo taken by Jonny von Wallström.

It all started with a presentation about Sweden's image in the Middle East and North Africa (read about it here). Apparently, Sweden is losing business in the MENA region against competition, typically in the form of big nations with long history of trade with the MENA region.

Not only that, there are still many cultural stereotypes about Swedes: they have lots of sex then they jump off a bridge and suicide because they aren't challenged with any problems. Kind of like saying all Arabs are terrorists who drink oil and eat sand, live in tents and under camels.

Yep, ladies and gents, we still know squat about each other.


Participants Olof Jönsson, Alexandra Sandels (Sweden) and Yousef Al Ghalban (Gaza) after a sauna session, drinking beer on the balcony, and going over a myriad of photographs of recent Israeli massacres in Gaza.

To this extent, the Swedish institute arranged for an opinion building program, entitled "Young Leaders Visitors Program" targetting opinion builders in the MENA and Sweden, to work on their skills within social media, intercultural group work, leadership... etc. The course started in a very relaxed spa hotel in Grisslehamn, about an hours' drive north of Stockholm, right on the Baltic sea.

The idea was simple: work our brains out trying to find creative solutions in very stressful schedules. It turned out we were not creative enough: we were tasked with finding impossible things that could happen, we mentioned living underwater, living on mars, world peace, etc, and it turns out that 80% of our choices were predicted by our creativity lecturer.


To think outside the box is not an easy thing - we are all indoctrinated to think within a larger box, perhaps, through education, history, values, etc. Making the impossible become possible requires a lot of digging deep within on the constraints in our own conscious. I gathered my own need to break free, inside out.

Lots of salmon is always guaranteed at dinner time.

We were tasked to find a rope outdoors while blind folded, and shape a square out of it. We did, Arab democracy style - screaming and shouting at one another - a microcosm of blinded Arab liberals who lose their temper whenever cornered with a new challenge - I am politically incorrect, and I consciously choose to be so. However, we made a perfect square, thanks to a couple of people who took initiative silently and thought effectively.

Then there was the whole deal with social media, piracy (coincidentally, the Swedish pirate party was voted into the European Parliament while we took part in the program), and if I may, virtual intelligence.




Here are my notes from Mark's lecture:
  • Social media is like language - you can't learn it unless you use it with people who use that language.
  • Taking what is published on one medium to another doesn't work, you have to develop material that suits each medium.
  • Newspapers are no longer the voice of the people, people have gotten their own voice.
  • Journalism education should stop looking into how things were done, and try to see more into how things should be done. Educators should be working in the industry.
  • Changes will look like they are illogical and messy, maybe even chaotic, because they introduced untested ideas and a package of conflict until everything is fine tuned.
  • Digitalization is as revolutionary as industrialization. The real shift is in the way we think and relate, not really in the technical aspects. (the disrputive aspects of new media).
  • The future is already here but it is unequally distributed, due to the different speeds of broadband and internet penetration percentages around the world.
  • Quality of media is not affected by platform: a theater review on a news paper is no less or more quality than on its website... however the internet gives more possibilities for intercommunicaition... but does that makes it a better quality?
  • "Digital changes everything" it is not about the tools - Digital media will fuck you up, it is disruptive media that will cause you soon worry.
  • Influence modules... Generation y tends to rely on their network of friends and their recommendations not traditional ads or propaganda... because they are immersed in media, both online and offline, we are marketed to left and right .. but we rely to our friends....
  • People used to trust companies more than governments but even that is changing...
  • Website : go to a place where people are is better than where they are not!
  • You do not trust an organization - you trust the people of the organization...
Then again, you can find more on my related twitter feed (filed under #YLVP). More details about people's trust in media, government, corporations can be found in this study (thanks mark!)


The ladies are listening, attentively.

There was also the group work, and psychologically analyzing one's attitudes and attributes as an individual and participant of a group. Åsa Silfverberg and Roger Sjögren at Hyper Island were in charge of the pedagogy of this program. We learned through different lectures, seminars, reflections and hands on group work training that we are all in need to build trust amongst ourselves in order to achieve anything (think Israel-Palestinian peace negotiations, they never really left off the ground, or did they?).

Dependency and Inclusion, counter dependency and fight, trust and structure, performance and productivity and termination: the stages of successful group work as presented by Åsa.

Åsa and Roger and their white boards and beautiful smiles.

For my part, I was just as interested in the learning methodolgy as with the content or the networking possibilities. Thanks to the open facilitation method of our "mentors" we've learned, even as Arabs who usually agree to disagree, to reach consensus to reach consensus (Swedish style) through talking things out, dropping our guards, and just letting go and reflecting on each stage of group work at a time. I think I will use some of these methods in any future lectures about Social Media in MENA (which I usually give at various Swedish universities for international journalism students).

The beautiful Amahl, formerly owner of the blog EuroArabe, and one of the bravest persons I've had the honor to meet in my life.


Life went on after Grisslehamn. We met again at Hyper Island in Stockholm for a series of lectures on creativity, social media and leadership. One highlight of this work was the Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI) workshop by Jarl Silfverberg - where we placed ourselves in three different colored positions, each according to their characteristics - in result, it turns out I am the Assertive-Nuturing type. (Look at graph here).

Then there was the group projects: our groups came up with brilliant ideas - NGO-volutneer network, a networks for alternative arab artists, a human right abuses geographical alarm clock, a trusted funding umbrella for small ngos, etc, etc. Lots of linkages were created between Swedish organizations and different group, mine mainly with Subtopia and Freemuse (where I will soon be publishing an article about the Jordanian metal scene and censorship in the 1990s).

There's all that, and there's the lovely YLVPers.

Artists, journalists, bloggers, activists, social workers etc. This course would have meant noll without our inputs, our conflicts, our "coming outs," and our reflections (the extracurricular ones, usually after a few stiff drinks). There's the blood, there's the swet, there are the tears, the hugs, the fights and all that beer. I shall not report here about what you said or did, but I will say, you've changed me for ever and renewed hope within my heart that Arabs are on the right track towards a new renaissance where open minds will take us into a brighter future.

Good job, will miss you all, and see you in Paris next november for stage 2.

And to end on a thought stimulating note, I bring you heavy weight Egyptian blogger Wael Abbas (YLVP 2008) talking about European rhetoric on democracy in the Middle East (during the opening session of YLVP 2009). Beside him is the Swedish trade minister (center-right government).



Friday, May 08, 2009

A short film-presentation about me for YLVP09



Special thanks go to Ryan Noble and Petra Hedbom for helping me with camera shots.

Monday, April 27, 2009

The middle east is getting armed to the teeth.

Good news for the arms industry, apparently.

According to a new report published by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, arms transfer rose by 38% in the Middle East between 2004-2008, compared to 1999-2003. The UAE rose to the fifth largest arms importer globally, while Iraq, and Israel are amongst the biggest importers of arms in the region during this period.

• During the period 2004–2008 the UAE was the largest recipient of major conventional weapons in the region and the third largest in the world. Imports in this period included around 80 F-16E combat aircraft from the USA and around 50 Mirage-2000-9 combat aircraft from France. The UAE placed a number of significant orders in 2008 and looks set to remain a significant importer in the coming years.

• During the period 2004–2008 Iraq was the world’s 28th largest recipient of major conventional weapons, with 40 per cent of its imports coming from the USA. In 2008 Iraq ordered 140 M1A1 tanks from the USA and announced plans to obtain advanced combat aircraft and additional armoured vehicles.

Israel’s arms imports in 2004–2008 consisted primarily of 102 F-16I combat aircraft and related air-to-air and air-to-surface weapons. The vast majority of weapon systems ordered by or transferred to Israel during this period came from the USA. Israel also imported components for its weapon systems from a variety of countries, including EU members.
According to SIPRI, the Middle East's share of total global transfers of major conventional weapons currently stands at 18%, rising from 15% during the previous study period. The UAE's share stood at 34%, Israel's at 22% and Egypt at 14%. The institutes explains that despite all speculations about Iran's arms import plans, "it accounted only for 5% of total imports in the region," making it the 27th largest importer globally.

The report does not reflect on another development in the Middle East: Nations are starting to develop their own weapons themselves, well, apart from Israel which is already amongs the top 10 producers, globally.

Jordan's King Abdullah II Design and Development Bureau for example, recently finished developing a Russian anti-tank grenade launcher , and relaunched it under the name Hashim RPG-32. According to CNN Arabic, the new launcher is considered a national security threat due to its ability to destroy any type of tanks. RPG's were used by Hezbollah during the 2006 one month war with Israel, and caused serious damage to Israeli tanks. (Original post by Yugi). It is unclear whether the weapon will be produced for exports or for local use. It is worthwhile to note that Jordan recently finalised a partnership deal with the NATO, as I blogged here.

At the end SIPRI warned that such developments are very dangerous given the conflict potential in the region, and especially at a time when the need for collective solutions is extremely important.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Facts and figures on Jordan's participation in ISAF/NATO in Afghanistan

Further research into the nature of Jordan's participation with the ISAF/NATO in Afghanistan revealed that Jordan helped military forces operating in Afghanistan and Iraq by providing medical support, a mine clearing team, police and military training and equipment and logistical support.

According to the US Department of Defense website:
"We have two hospitals, one in Iraq and one in Afghanistan," Royal Jordanian Air Force Col. Nart Alkhas said. A 50-bed Jordanian military hospital located in Masar-e Sharif, Afghanistan, cares for more than 650 patients a day, providing critical health care for thousands of Afghans who suffered neglect at the hands of the Taliban regime. More than 500,000 patients have been treated at the Jordanian military hospital in Afghanistan. Many of the patients are women, who were forced into a subservient role and feared to leave their homes until coalition forces entered Afghanistan in 2001.

In Iraq, a second Jordanian military hospital provides much-needed health services to Iraqis and serves as an ad hoc trauma center, treating patients wounded in terrorist attacks and moving them to Jordan or other locations "if they are in bad condition," Alkhas said. More than 4 million people have been treated in Jordan's military hospital in Iraq, and Jordanian military general surgeons have performed 1,638 surgeries, Alkhas said.

Jordan has committed nearly 600 health care practitioners to the medical assistance missions in Iraq and Afghanistan. They consist of medical personnel and Jordanian special forces, who protect the hospital staff, Alkhas said.

Jordanians have donated 250 armored personnel carriers to the Iraqi Ministry of Defense. The vehicles consisted of 50 Ukrainian-built BTR-94 armored personnel carriers, 100 British Spartans, and 100 American-made M113A1 armored personnel carriers, coalition officials said. Jordan also donated two C-130B Hercules transport aircraft to the Iraqi air force, as well as 16 UH-1H utility helicopters.

According to the US Department of Defense, the US military provides round the clock logistical support to the Jordanian operation in Afghanistan so Jordanians can focus on providing medical support.

However, there are also confirmed reports that Jordan did in fact help logistically in "Operation enduring freedom," by allowing US forces to use its bases and facilities. This document from the Library of Congress provides a detailed background to this participation.

In 2002, for example, Jordan was negotiating an agreement with the US " to allow US forces use this Jordan to defend Israel from Iraqi missiles." In 1996, more than 1200 US Military personnel established a camp in Azraq in the east of Jordan. Among a dozen other Arab ports, the Aqaba port in south Jordan was used by the US Navy to support operations in the Middle East, by coordinating fuel-related activities.

Among seven other Arab nations, Jordan participates in partnership dialogues with the NATO, it recently finalised a 2 year partnership agreement.

As to why the US supports Jordan as an ally, apart from its geographical proximity and its "expertise" factor, this document from the Library of Congress shows that the US considers the "stability of the regime and succession in Jordan" as a US interest.
The original “East Bank” Jordanians, through probably no longer a majority in Jordan, remain predominant in the country’s political and military establishments and form the bedrock of support for the Jordanian monarchy. Palestinians, who comprise an estimated 55% to 70% of the population, in many cases tend to regard their stay in Jordan as temporary, and some are at most lukewarm in their support for the Jordanian regime.
No official details were to be found yet of any other military cooperation between the US and Jordan. But it is no secret that the intelligence cooperation between Jordan and its allies is ripe.

Until more updated information surfaces, I am done with this research, which I did out of personal interest after finding a leaked NATO document mentioning that Jordan wanted to keep its participation at the ISAF as a "secret." Apparently, it was all over the internet before it got to me.

I am being asked why am I publishing this information, when discussing security matters in Jordan is considered a "taboo" and can get one in trouble. What I am doing is no more than copying and pasting information from official and responsible sources, out of my interest as an independent journalist in fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

No honor in killing!

Jordanian bloggers have been recharging against the so called honor killings . Every year, an average of twenty women are killed on suspicion of "adultery" in mostly-conservative Jordan. The murderers are their husbands or relatives who do so to reclaim the "family honor." More often than not, the victims turn out to be sexually inactive at the time of the murder. Many mistake this for being part of Islamic practice. The punishment for "adultery" in Sharia law is by whipping convicts, not killing them, provided that four witnesses caught them "red handed."

Real stories & reflections in my round up on Global Voices Online.

Saturday, April 04, 2009

Jordan becomes a full NATO partner

Former NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer in Amman, Jordan 2005. Full speech. NATO appointed Danish PM Anders Fogh Rasmussen as the new Secretary General. He was at the center of defending Denmark during the so-called "Muhammad Cartoon Crisis."

Jordan finalized its Individual Cooperation Program (ICP) with the NATO, becoming a full partner with the north Atlantic alliance. The announcement came on April 1, 2009, at the NATO Annual Summit meeting in Strasbourg, France.

This ICP will contribute to the promotion of political and military ties between the Euro-Atlantic and the Mediterranean regions. Through enhanced security cooperation between NATO and its MD partner Jordan, it will reinforce Mediterranean regional security and stability.

It also helps framing NATO-Jordan political and military cooperation in a more strategic and prospective way. Jordan's decision to finalize the Individual Cooperation Program with NATO represents a significant step forward in its cooperation with the Atlantic Alliance.

This bilateral accord provides that Jordan and NATO cooperate on a wide range of categories such as "political and security issues; defense, security and military issues; public information; science and environment; civil emergency planning; and administrative, protective security and resource issues." Egypt was the first Arab nation to finalize its partnership agreement, Jordan is second.

Jordan started its dialouge with NATO back in the late King Hussains time, in 1995, one year after signing the Peace Treaty with Israel. The cooperation stepped up its pace when King Abdullah II, Chief of the Jordanian Armed Forces, was enthroned 10 years ago.

Following up on my recent blog posts and the buzz it created about Jordan's "not-so-secret" involvement with the NATO-ISAF operations in Afghanistan, I had an exchange with one of my ex-editors at The Jordan Times. He pointed me to the fact that Jordan announced it would send troops to Afghanistan in 2001 for "peace-keeping". The editor added that Jordanian journalists were flewn to Mazar-i-Sherif in Afghanistan to see in their own eyes a Jordanian military clinic in the war zone.

However, contrary to other "peace keeping" missions that Jordan was/is involved with, i.e. Croatia, Bosnia Herzogvania, Sierra Leone and East Timor, Afghanistan is still in a state of conventional war. Jordan's participation in the ISAF, as shown in a leaked NATO document, means it is not merely operating a "clinic". In 2007, the Herald Tribune reported that more than 90 Jordanian security personnel were deployed in Afghanistan.

Afghanistan, dubbed by the NATO as its largest and most important land operation outside Europe, is one frontline of the "global war on terrorism." Although both the UK and the US have refrained from using this term, the land operation is now expanding into Pakistan, while the intelligence action of the conflict continues to take shape on a global scale.

Jordan has participated significantly in the intellgentiance part and it paid a dear price, when Al Qaeda in Iraq killed more than 60 Jordanians in a 2005 bombing in Amman. Later on, Jordanian-US intelligence cooperation led to terminating almost all Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq.

The agreement between Jordan and NATO is yet another reminder that it is time Jordanians are fully informed about the global role of their nation and its global alliances. It will be good for everybody's business and would create more trust between citizens and the government.

According to the Acting Director of the Stockholm Institute for Peace Research, global opposition to the operation in Afghanistan is minimal, compared to other operations such as Iraq. More information about media and the global war on terrorism here, and to put things in context, here's some background from my own exchanges with Professor Noam Chomsky.

I left more comments on 7iber, where a "retired officer" replied: "Rami is a drummer and a veteran politician, I don't get why he thinks he's better than anyone else". So, to the "officers" dissecting my blog, I will save you the benefit of doubt: I am an independent journalist, I don't work for anyone but myself. There you go, a lot easier than having to go through 4 years of blog posts (as seen here).

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Why opposition to the war in Afghanistan is so minimal (compared to Iraq)?

Today I met with the acting Director of SIPRI, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Mr. Daniel Nord, on the side lines of a conference on water as a catalyst for peace treaties or future conflicts.

I asked him a question that has been on my mind for a long time, and particularly in light of the new NATO document which reveled that my home country is taking part secretly in the ISAF forces in Afghanistan.

The question was, why is there no global opposition to the war in Afghanistan, the same way the war on Iraq triggered so many global demonstrations and movements? Why is it more or less taken "for granted"?

He said the conflict in Afghanistan is not a new one, it has been going on for more than 40 years, but under different flags. The US-NATO-ISAF reintroduced the conflict in the context of the "war on terrorism" following the 9-11 terrorist attacks. The war was justified in the sense that Afghanistan refused to cooperate in eliminating the bad guys.

He said the war was introduced as a notion of "good will," that the world wants to get rid of an enemy of civilization. As opposed to Iraq, where everyone deemed it is a war for fragmenting the region to get hold of its resources, Afghanistan was seen as a nation ruled by extremist war lords and not a functioning state.

I asked if the location of Afghanistan or its resources were of any strategic significance to what the NATO calls its "most important operation today"? He said if the NATO forces pull out of Afghanistan today, Russia, India, Pakistan and Iran are likely going to interfere in its stead, and that is something that world powers do not accept.

"There's a limit though," he said, "there are casualties among NATO troops and that is why people back home want their soldiers back and safe." So it is only a matter of timing.

He agreed that the "war on terrorism" was a pretext for a lot of things, i.e. cracking down on any form of political dissidence, reorganizing the global financial power balance, etc. But in the context of the recent global changes, i.e. financial crisis, US Presidential elections result, etc, we're beginning to hear about its end, at least in rhetoric.